Thomas Hertweck schrieb:
> > houghi wrote:
> > [...]
> > The issue is still, I believe, that communication is lacking and
> > lacking seriously.
> So you
> need to somehow convince them that this is necessary/beneficial and
> you should come up with a list in what area and in which way the
> communication could be improved (saying "it must be improved" is far
> too general).
I would like to discuss the criteria for software release decisions. I
don't read factory, so sorry, if this was discussed there. But in future
I would really like the community to be asked, if features like the
packages selection in yast are dumped. There is no replacement, and it
is an important feature in heterogenous environments, where autoyast is
not feasible. So is it until now simply up to the coder of zypp, which
features are supported and which ones not? As this "bug" was reported
before the final release, what are the criteria for decisions in the
beta phase? Manager (who wants SUSE Linux as test bed for the enterprise
version) over release engineer?
And please, here no discussion about package selections or autoyast, but
about the criteria for decisions in the software release. 10.1, IMHO,
proved that there is room for improvement.
Ciao
Siegbert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
