> >Jan Engelhardt wrote: >> how can I make smart from suse linux 10.1 _not_ consider i686 packages? > >You can't as of now.
So how come it does not try to install x86_64 rpms? >Would be on my wishlist as well. > >Usually it isn't a problem as packages are always provided in the same >version and release on both architectures. But there have been some >buggers in the Build Service recently where that wasn't the case, and >smart choked somewhat on resolving those deps/provides. The problem is that an i586 machine (yes, without the CMOV and other fun that makes up i686) tries to pull i686 packages, even though they will segfault for sure. >Please open a bug >http://tracker.labix.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&project=smart > >It's not as easy to solve as it sounds though. >Either you make smart ignore 32bit packages alltogether, which should be >quite simple to implement, or you'd have to change the dependency solver >weighting algorithm, and that's definitely not as easy. > >cheers >- -- > -o) Pascal Bleser http://linux01.gwdg.de/~pbleser/ > /\\ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > _\_v The more things change, the more they stay insane. >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) > >iD8DBQFElCkSr3NMWliFcXcRAqDcAKCbGAUGciub45PwkEI5w3OqNkGXBQCgj3M9 >ahT8RjoakOBIh8xKMmsezxE= >=v8EL >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jan Engelhardt -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
