On Tuesday 11 July 2006 20:19, Sven Jacobs wrote: > > This doesn't really help you, but those programs are broken and should be > > fixed by their maintainers. The only reliably correct way to get to the > > kernel source is through the symlink in the /lib/modules directory (now > > that must be named the same as the kernel, otherwise nothing will work) > > The source symlink in /lib/modules/2.6.16.20-1.1-default is broken! It > points to /usr/src/linux-2.6.16.20-1.1 which does not exist. > > So it's a bug of the kernel-default or kernel-source package?
It seems the problem is that the repo is out of sync. I just downloaded the kernel myself, and I didn't see the same issue, I got both kernel and source 2.6.16.21-0.4 -- Ut supra post festum sunt obscura --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
