> Installation and Update sources are now handled the same way, so normal > Installation will install also the latest security update, or the updater > will install new / changed dependencies of packages.
Ok; indeed, it's a good reason. But I think this info not appears in Release Notes file. I know it's a minor change, but possibly others users don't know it (as me, of course :P) Maybe will be good idea to include that info in the Release Notes file. > Because it is not cryptographically signed. This means that you cannot > ensure that an attacker has modified it (on the ftp site) to install > exploits your machine or similar. ¿Can the packman admins signs their packages? I think packman repositories have prestige enough for that. I don't see any reason to don't make it. > Well zen-updater can be deinstalled just fine, you likely want to deinstall > zmd too... (which might have more dependencies.) ;) -- Jordi Espasa Clofent Linux user id 332494 #http://counter.li.org/ PGP id 0xC5ABA76A #http://pgp.mit.edu/ FSF Associate Member id 4281 #http://www.fsf.org/
pgptsNjdGCcGI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
