Hi, BandiPat schrieb: > there is no mention of such in the box
"find /usr/share/doc/packages -name COPYING | head" returns: /usr/share/doc/packages/gnome-icon-theme/COPYING /usr/share/doc/packages/yast2-schema/COPYING /usr/share/doc/packages/yast2-trans-de/COPYING /usr/share/doc/packages/tango-icon-theme/COPYING /usr/share/doc/packages/audiofile/COPYING /usr/share/doc/packages/cabextract/COPYING /usr/share/doc/packages/dosfstools/dosfsck/COPYING /usr/share/doc/packages/dosfstools/mkdosfs/COPYING /usr/share/doc/packages/ethtool/COPYING /usr/share/doc/packages/expat/COPYING And these are only the first 10 ones. > nor are there any sources included with the > release as the GPL specifies there should be The GPL does not specify that. > if I'm not mistaken. You are mistaken. The GPL requires that the sources must be offered, it even allows charging a fee for that. And they are offered: http://www.novell.com/de-de/products/suselinux/source_code.html After reading the post on groklaw again, I still don't understand it and actually I think the user made this post because he hates SUSE 10.1 quality and now searches for reasons to make a little bit of noise, not more. Andreas Hanke --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
