hi all, it may looks like I'm on the wrong way, but ... for a lot of things I'm doing here I need to install the sources of the kernel (and some other stuff that cames drectly from the DVD ).
so, the first thing after a fresh install is the install of the kernel sources. aren't that the same as the sources people are talking about ? and if not - what are the diffs ? the same question about all the other sources you can install directly from DVD / ISO / internet - I realy can't see whats missing. btw: I think the GPL gives to mutch room about what can be done and what not. I'm a reader of the german service at heise.de. they often write about the kernel ( + the kernel mailinglist ), the GPL etc, and there are often posts from the developers of the kernel from the mailinglist where two or more people have different claims about what is possible and what not, and what should be done and on what way. so, if even the developer of the kernel don't have all the same agreement with the GPL - how can then others outside the kernel group agree with the GPL on the same way ? (sorry, I can't say it better in my bad english - I hope you understand what I mean .. ). best regards from berlin from the little confust JBScout aka Thomy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
