-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Martin Schlander wrote:
> Onsdag 30 august 2006 18:59 skrev Dominique Leuenberger:
>> according to nVidia there is NO restriction for distribution on
>> their driver.
>> A good place for it would thus probably also be the Build-Server,
>> wouldn't it? With a dependency on the Kernel, if I understand this
>> system right, the BuildService would trigger a recompile of the module.
>>
>> Any comments on this are more than welcome!
> 
> I believe the primary reason that SUSE/Novell do not host the current KMPs 
> are 
> issues with GPL and kernel devs. 
> 
> As long as Nvidia are not in compliance I don't think the KMPs can be shipped 
> through official channels - at least not with the current policy, with which 
> I agree completely.
> 
> Or do the KMPs solve all the legal issues that the traditional kernel modules 
> had?

No, the KMPs are not there to solve legal issues.
Well, it can solve the legal issue for Novell, if someone builds and
hosts nVidia KMPs elsewhere ;)

nVidia KMP maintainer, anyone ? (e.g. hosted on Packman)

- --
  -o) Pascal Bleser     http://linux01.gwdg.de/~pbleser/
  /\\ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 _\_v The more things change, the more they stay insane.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFE+aLDr3NMWliFcXcRAm9QAJ46Q2+5NyghpWZGQ0x0Ehxj12lQowCfUGgB
3XScNS65hvzI2IAPptQdvlo=
=8QSM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to