On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 15:05 +0200, Frank Steiner wrote: > Frank Steiner wrote > > > Jan Engelhardt wrote > > > >> IPADDR='192.168.222.1' > >> IPADDR_2='10.10.10.10' > >> > >> NETWORK='192.168.222.0' > >> NETWORK_2='10.0.0.0' > >> > >> NETMASK='255.255.255.0' > >> NETMASK_2='255.0.0.0' > > > > Ok, that's really simple and a much better concept than in 9.0 :-) > > Hmm, but it isn't really the same. While the host can be pinged with > the IPADDR_2, I can't see it in ifconfig. And I guess I can't (or at > least, don't know how to) setup a separate routing for private addresses, > like I could do when the private address was an own virtual device eth0:0? >
The above example will work _if_ you keep the numbers in the same subnet. To use different subnets on the same PC use different physical devices or you will have nothing but problems with routing. -- Ken Schneider UNIX since 1989, linux since 1994, SuSE since 1998 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
