> what are you experiences like?
> do you recommended it?
Yes.
> what are the pros?
Seems to be more cache-aggressive (although #linuxfs people deny that),
hence is faster on some operations (such as re-stat)
Quota is counted from mount time on (this is not the
case with any other filesystem out there).
(No other Linux distribution has XFS support as good as SUSEs --
FC may but I have not tested FC on an x86 actually, which is a
different problem)
> what are the cons?
>
Don't know right now.
Can't shrink filesystems, but I suppose reiser3 is the only one to do
that. However, growing/shrinking is only for those who fail to partition
their disk properly.
> I have a system that i want to install for a longer term as a server so i am
>
> not planning on reinstalling it in the near future after deployment.
> hopefully not for several years :) (updates would be performed :) )
> so if you have any recommendetions on experiences and best practices
> regarding filesystems in general and XFS in particular as im considering
> it as a prime candidate instead of ext3 do let me know.
> --
> Regards
> -RP-
> ___________________________
>
> If computers were made in heaven,
> would they be perfect?
> ___________________________
>
-`J'
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
