On Sat, 2006-10-21 at 11:01 +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote: > On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 02:01:18AM +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote: > > On 2006-10-21 01:14:00 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > > >I've read that Ubuntu is going to use Upstart ( > > > >http://upstart.ubuntu.com/ ). > > > > > > > >I'm wondering how openSuSE is thinking about Upstart? If openSuSE and/or > > > > > > There have been _so many_ sysvinit replacements, and init-ng is just one > > > of the other ones talked about more-or-less. No switch since. Unlikely > > > to happen without thorough evaluation. > > > > init-ng looks like fun (package at the same place.) > > > > the problem when testing init systems is the amount of work. > > you need to port major parts of your old init scripts to the new system. > > so you can properly compare both. > > I think we have enough own speedups already ;) > > upstart however seems a new methodology on approaching the concept overall. >
Is there a particular reason to re-invent the wheel? -- Ken Schneider UNIX since 1989, linux since 1994, SuSE since 1998 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
