On 06/10/30 07:58 (GMT-0400) Steffen Winterfeldt apparently typed:

> You can of course switch to mount by label/uuid and get rid of the
> 'classical' device names. Which is, I believe, more or less the targeted
> long-term solution.

But will this let you install to sata when the installer can't see your
"sda21" partition that proprietary operating systems/kernels have no
problem using or creating? That inability means Linux never gets installed
to this multiboot sata only system where / is allocated to /dev/hda16 aka
/dev/sda16, and rearranging both partitioning and backup/restore
strategies is simply not doable.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214992

> Note that the names are not the real problem with this step but that sd*
> allows for less partitions per device than hd*.

For several hours I've been searching unsuccessfully through
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/ trying to find out why libata uses the scsi
path and consequently scsi's absurd 15 partition per disk limitation. I
know the limit itself is a block major/minor limit, but can't find any
background on the choice to take the scsi path, or discussion of any
proposals to work around the limit. Any help finding this would be
appreciated.
-- 
"The Lord is my strength and my shield; my heart trusts in him,
and I am helped."                               Psalm 28:7 NIV

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409

Felix Miata  ***  http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to