Hello, Am Montag, 30. Oktober 2006 10:56 schrieb Steffen Winterfeldt: > On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote: > > On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, Gomez, Daniel wrote: > > > My host only has IDE. Why I am using sda is beyond me. I thought > > > for a moment my drive was SATA for a moment but it is not. There > > > is a big problem here. > > > > I had a similar surprise: ata_piix was selected instead of piix, > > resulting in /dev/sda instead of /dev/hda.
I'll add brokenmodule=ata_piix because of the following question: Is it expected that the installation hangs about a minute (!) displaying "loading ata_piix"? If not, I'll file a bugreport ;-) > Beta1 did select ata_piix accidentally, though, and it will be gone > in beta2 (already gone in FACTORY). Hmm, on my laptop ata_pixx was used with Factory downloaded last night... - just not synced out yet or reason for a bugreport? Regards, Christian Boltz -- >gehe zu 'http://www.linuxiso.org/' Zu Fuß? [> Michael Meyer und Thorsten Haude in suse-linux] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
