Rajko M wrote: > I can't access bug so I can't see what happened, but if you was persistant in > opening bug report that is actually not technical issue, than I can imagine > why bug was marked as private.
Hi, Thanks for the emails so far. I reopened the bug once initially, thinking that the person who closed it was not really a bug triager but someone like a fanboy (due to his/her unprofessional attitude). You can see what was going on in the bug report before it was hidden from us: http://papers.memebot.com/opensusebug.pdf > For this list code is already present > http://en.opensuse.org/Opensuse_mailing_list_netiquette > and what is missing there is explained in many other Internet sources. Nice to know the mailing list has a code of conduct. I wish you could implement to opensuse's bugzilla something like this: http://en.opensuse.org/Opensuse_mailing_list_netiquette#Don.27t_be_aggressive > The bugzilla is engineering tool. > Posting there message that has nothing to do with technical part of > development is breaking the rules of conduct. I am more used to how Ubuntu handles bugs (my secondary computer has -used to have- opensuse). At one point, before they started using "specs" (i.e. feature requests), something like this would go to their bugzilla. I didn't know only software engineers were hanging out in opensuse's bugzilla. I assumed that all "development decisions" were being officially tracked there, and separation from Novell was truly a development decision. I apologize for that false assumption, but, as you mentioned too, that isn't an excuse for cursing at costumers. Thanks again for the emails. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
