On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 you said: > On Sunday 12 November 2006 12:33, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > > There is also a good reason not to. Let's take the promiment example of > > LKML, where you do not have to be subscribed. So you have to be Cc'ed or > > To'ed somehow. Second case LKML: People throw all their list mails into > > one folder (the unimportant stuff) and get a direct reply for threads > > they have taken part in. That's why your patch is often ignored when > > just submitted to lkml without any persons directly cc'ed. > > Aaah!! this is starting to 'P&*$' me off its got to be the list sending me > two > of everything, I've heard of two for the price of one but its getting > annoying
I have yet to see a multiple instance of any mail. Put recipe this in your .procmailrc :0Wh: msgid.lock | formail -D 1024 $PMDIR/msgid.cache See procmailex(1) Theo (who loves the way *nix can delegate special tasks to specialized programs, instead of relying on one program to (be able to) do everything) -- Theo v. Werkhoven Registered Linux user# 99872 http://counter.li.org Voorhout ICQ: 277217131 ICBM 52 13 26N , 4 29 47E. Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voor GNUpg/pgp zie headers. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
