On Sunday 12 November 2006 18:05, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > * Anders Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11-12-06 10:50]: > ... > > > Could be. That usually means the source wouldn't build, so there were no > > binary packages created. Which means the kernel-source package you have > > is doubly broken > > ?? then why would there not be a kernel-default-2.6.18.1-2 ???
Like I said, if there is a kernel-source package in that directory without a matching kernel binary package, it means that for some reason, the binary package didn't build --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
