Mon, 13 Nov 2006, by [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > On Monday 13 November 2006 06:30, Theo v. Werkhoven wrote: > > Mon, 13 Nov 2006, by [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > On Sunday 12 November 2006 17:18, Theo v. Werkhoven wrote: > > > > There have been examples from people explaining howto let kmail > > > > re-write a(ny) header to whatever you wish. > > It was in a thread about the ***SPAM*** in the Subject a few weeks > > ago (on the suse-e ML). > Missed it because I did not follow the SPAM subject in detail. Lost interest > after the first ten email's. Why did you not inform me that Randall Schulz > gave you a direct information that "KMail filter actions can edit headers > directly." Would have made it much easier. Found it and use it in the > meantime.
I'm not using kmail as you can see in the headers, so I have no vested interest to search back in the archives. > > > > Please repair your signature, and let it start with > > > > > > No idea where you are talking about. Neither about the repair suggestion > > > nor about the stripping of stripping signatures. > Never felt that I missed the stripping thingy. If there's a job that a program can do for me I'm always happy, doesn't matter if it's 2 lines or 10. > > Others did, so it's not my English that is b0rked. > Well, try it Dutch ;). Or let us do it via Skype. You have my account. > > Maybe some Googling would help you out? > Stripping on Google did of course turn out a lot of material (19.600.000), > stripping signature still a lot (1.450.000) and SuSE added gave only a few > (44.200) but still to much to wade through if I have no idea why I should > bother anyhow. "strip signatures" gave intelligible answers on the first page for me (number 7 e.g.). > > It's not so very difficult to see the difference between the > > signature you gave and e.g. mine. > Nice to see now that your lines are automatically stripped in this response. > But as I try to snip anyhow superfluous text from responses it was never a > problem for me. It's not so much a problem, but, like I said, something a(ny) "well-behaving" mailclient does. It's a "polite" thing to do for a mailclient, like cutting text and in-between replying is for us. > The signature lines were taken from one of the former discussions and mine > looks as follows. > #!/bin/bash echo "Powered by SuSE 10.1 Kernel 2.6.16.21-0.25-default KDE > 3.5.4 Kmail 1.9.4" uptime > In your case you seem to have used the input file. Would be nice to give me > the command line for a "correct" signature. <space> does not seem to work in > bash :). #!/bin/bash cat <<EOL -- Powered by SuSE 10.1 Kernel 2.6.16.21-0.25-default KDE 3.5.4 Kmail 1.9.4 $(uptime) EOL # /* notice the extra space after the two dashes! */ Theo -- Theo v. Werkhoven Registered Linux user# 99872 http://counter.li.org ICBM 52 13 26N , 4 29 47E. + ICQ: 277217131 SUSE 9.2 + Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kernel 2.6.8 + See headers for PGP/GPG info. Claimer: any email I receive will become my property. Disclaimers do not apply. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
