On Sunday 19 November 2006 16:53, Anders Johansson wrote: > I'm not good enough at physics to be able to decipher it, but from general > principles, it seems to me that a discovery like that, if it had any merit, > would have been more publicised
Sure. > When I first read it though, it did look a bit like someone had managed - > in 2006 - to patent Alternating Current That is the reason I started to read :-) and as I couldn't quite understand what it was about I asked for opinion. To me, it seems just as generator of impulse current explained overly broad. -- Regards, Rajko M. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
