> Then presumably *no-one* using the main Linux distros will be able to > design > sites for customers using hosters still on PHP4 without a lot of needless > hassle.
migration to PHP5 for the large part of applications out there is very simple. >I feel happy that I am in such august and universal company, but > that isn't the point. Until the bulk of lower-tier hosters have moved to > PHP5 or PHP6 (you might like to do a bit of scouting around to see just > how > few have moved so far even to PHP5), this is caused by a chicken and egg problem... if we provide both PHP4 and 5 , peeple will stay in php4 and we will have to support it and theyu will not move... > You may be in the luxurious position of telling a client to move hosters Kinda, telling customers to get a decent hosting platform. > but how exactly is saying that > PHP4 is so insecure that no-one should ever use it under *any* > circumstances > going to help the image of PHP6 (when it appears)? PHP6 does not have the key insecure features like register_globals, magic_quotes, safe_mode.. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
