probably 256m is the bare minimum if you want to run KDE or Gnome. I once tried running 9.x on a 128mb system. Forget it. Unusable.
dg
On 12/1/06, Felix Miata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2006/12/01 19:59 (GMT+0200) Alexey Eremenko apparently typed: > > > openSUSE 10.x is more memory intensive than XP. But much less than > > Windows Vista. > > Memory requirement depends on environment. Without X running, 32M is > probably adequate. With X running, how much RAM is adequate depends on > which desktop you run and how many apps you keep open at once. So to say > any OpenSUSE version is more memory intensive than something else is > just hogwash. Everyone who uses XFCE seems to think 128M is plenty, > while 128M is barely usable in XP. OTOH, 256M can disappear quickly if > you use KDE, while XP seems perfectly happy with it. > -- > "Let your conversation be always full of grace." Colossians 4:6 NIV > > Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 > > Felix Miata *** http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/ > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
-- "Develop success from failures. Discouragement and failure are two of the surest stepping stones to success." - Dale Carnegie -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
