On Monday 04 December 2006 00:29, steve reilly wrote: > On Sunday 03 December 2006 18:13, Pete Connolly wrote: > > OK then, I'll have a look at the source and see how far I get. Judging > > by the article at > > http://nileshbansal.blogspot.com/2006/05/democracy-player-on-suse-100.htm > >l it might be a bit of a slog, but we'll see how far we can get. > > > > Packaging an RPM isn't something that I do too often, but as per usual > > I'll take it as a learning opportunity :) > > > > Cheers > > > > Pete > > When trying the rpm available from sourceforge, I was able to whittle down > the dependencies to just python 2.4 it was calling for, and using 2.5 on > 10.2rc1. Would it matter the difference between the 2? they should be > downward compatible correct? >
Which RPM did you try? The FC 6 rpm had a lot of dependency errors for libraries that were already installed, as does the FC 5 one. After reading Pascal's email it seems that it might be an idea to raise an enhancement request in Bugzilla. I'll get on that today. Cheers Pete -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
