Okay. Thanks. I'll stop worrying about it <G>. On Saturday 09 December 2006 09:05, Joe Morris (NTM) wrote: > Brett I. Holcomb wrote: > > On Saturday 09 December 2006 04:28, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > >> Why do you need i686? (Ok, there are a few like glibc.) i586 works for > >> everyone. > > > > That's a question I've wondered about - If we have a 686 system wouldn't > > the 686 packages be better than the 586? > > I have read here the difference is so slight that it isn't worth it for > most packages. Some packages do benefit to be sure, but they are few in > number. > > > -- > Joe Morris > Registered Linux user 231871
-- Brett I. Holcomb -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
