On Sunday 17 December 2006 18:28, John Bright wrote: > On Saturday 04 November 2006 10:21, Randall R Schulz wrote: > > You might want to consider the perspective of the subscribers who > > have been here for years and whose ratio of answers supplied to > > questions asked is high but who nonetheless stick around in order > > to be a service to the community of (Enlgish-speaking) SuSE users. > > > > Perhaps you can see how we'd grow weary of the panoply of faux pas > > that stream in daily. > > > > It's the same old debate: Do you forgive all the crap and nonsense > > and let the list devolve into drivel or to you ride herd on the > > newbies in order to instruct them on the way intelligent list > > interactions are carried on? I'm in the latter camp. > > No as I have see it there are a few fools who really have a few > answers.
Eh? I cannot decipher that. Please try to clarify or amplify. Randall Schulz -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
