On 20 Dec 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> One (relatively) recent problems with Bayesian filters is that many
> SPAM messages are constructed in such a way that they poison your
> filters.  If you train such messages as SPAM, they contain enough
> "good" text, which is irrelevant to the SPAM itself, so to
> progressively weaken the discriminatory capabilities of your filters.
> The effect shows in the long run.  It's a tad sad, because Bayesian
> were once highly effective.

Yes, unfortunately combating spam is a full time job for the Spam filter
authors. I even have URIDNSBL and razor2 turned on in my Spamassassin
install, but it is still not 100%.

Charles

-- 
DPRINTK("Last time you were disconnected, how about now?\n");
        linux-2.6.6/drivers/net/tokenring/ibmtr.c

Attachment: pgp4A0RFI263e.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to