On Thursday 21 December 2006 00:42, Darryl Gregorash wrote: > On 2006-12-20 16:21, Charles philip Chan wrote: > > On 20 Dec 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> So it does seem to be a definite kernel bug. weird. > > > > They don't work with kernel 2.6.19 either. > > > > Charles > > Incorrect. Felix Miata has compiled one which works, with a lot of > stuff > > stripped out: > > On 2006/12/20 09:01 (GMT+-0500) Nick Zentena apparently typed: > >> > On Wednesday 20 December 2006 09:02, Felix Miata wrote: > >>> >> Have you read the bug? Etch's and Fedora's 2.6.18 kernels > >>> >> also fail. OTOH, the vanilla 2.6.19 kernel worked for me > >>> >> yesterday, and still works today. > >> > > >> > How did you configure it? I downloaded it and did an make > >> > oldconfig. It still fails here. > > > > I didn't build it specifically for testing this problem, instead > > for cifs & smbfs testing. I stripped out a lot of useless > > hardware support to conserve space. > > http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/tmp/config > > Maybe we can talk Felix into adding stuff back in, until it breaks > -- then we will have found the culprit :-)
Adding back in: not 1 by 1, but 50% by 50%. With 16 items, you would need 4 runs (2^4=16)..., maybe less if you leave unrelated stuff out. ;-P Cheers, Leen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
