-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The Thursday 2006-12-21 at 12:35 +0100, Sandy Drobic wrote:
> > Using blacklists for warning/marking purposes seems ok to me, but letting a
> > blacklist make decisions can be dangerous. Just my opinion.
>
> Spamassassin and consorts do that kind of check. Unfortunately, these checks
> are expensive (many external dns queries and cpu intensive content checks). If
> you have a high-volume mailserver you will probably choke on all the spam that
> gets processed by the content_filter.
However, I understand that this is precisely what SuSE server does. You
know, _I_ would be rejected otherwise ;-)
- --
Cheers,
Carlos E. R.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76
iD8DBQFFioCatTMYHG2NR9URArL+AKCWn+2VwtjlMnXfvpEVSE5KS/12PwCeKiVy
D5cMQBI7DeevFNTqGba1jS0=
=zT9Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
