Randall R Schulz wrote: > On Sunday 24 December 2006 19:46, J Sloan wrote: >> Randall R Schulz wrote: >>> Can you define what you mean when you say: >>> >>> - "enough of a critical mass" >>> - "to matter" >>> - "leverage control" >>> - "onramps to the information highway" >>> - "game over" >>> - "meaningful access" >>> - "most internet content" >>> - "islands" >>> - "hopeless, irrelevant rebellion" >>> - "microsoft world" >> Sorry, but if you're going to play dumb, it would be far too tedious >> and time consuming to try and bring you up to speed. Suffice it to >> say there is apparently a huge gap between our positions. Go back to >> sleep... > > Then I take it you cannot neither explicate nor defend your position, > whatever it may be, using concrete, unambiguous and non-metaphorical > language. > > > I accept your concession.
No need. Perhaps I was too hasty to dismiss your questions - Each of the points you reference above can be easily grasped with just a bit of thought, but I hesitate to put a lot of work into explaining all these points if you're really determined not to understand. The bottom line is that you apparently see no danger to linux, but I do - as for the details, they will have to await another post, when I have some time to laboriously explain each of the common terms used above. Joe -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
