Randall R Schulz wrote: > On Sunday 24 December 2006 23:56, Fred A. Miller wrote: > >> On Monday December 25 2006 2:34 am, Randall R Schulz wrote: >> >>> On Sunday 24 December 2006 19:21, Fred A. Miller wrote: >>> >>>> http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,72342-0.html >>>> >>> That's a broken link. >>> >>> Could you get the correct one and re-send? Here or on off-topic, >>> it's all the same to me. >>> >> Sorry........it's: >> http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,72342-0.html Just like I have >> it above. 'Just checked it again.....works fine. >> > > 'Cept it doesn't: > > -==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==- > Sorry, that file was not found > > The file your browser requested could not be found on our servers. We > may have recently moved around, renamed, or deleted certain files. > > * If you were looking for a particular article or topic, try using > our search form in the header above. > * If you clicked a link somewhere on our site and were led to this > page, please let us know so we can fix our mistake as soon as possible. > * Otherwise, try returning back to Wired News Home and browsing from > there. > -==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==- > > > I tried both clicking in KMail and copy-and-paste into the browser's > address box. I'm using Firefox 1.5.0.8 under 10.2. I have noticed no > other symptoms of problems with Web access. > > > I suspect you may have some problem on your end. I can click on either link above and get to that article.
I've sent you an email with that page attached. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
