[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon December 25 2006 2:16 am, jdd scratched these words onto a > coconut shell, hoping for an answer: > >> C. Brouerius van Nidek a écrit : >> >>> On Monday 25 December 2006 10:21, Fred A. Miller wrote: >>> >>>> http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,72342-0.html >>>> >>> And when are you comming back on the OT list? >>> >> I think this is not OT. I don't follow OT list and HR >> problems impact us all... reiserfs users >> >> jdd >> > > William DuBois is his attorney? Reiser is in real trouble. That guy is > better at politics than actual defence bar work.. If there really is > no money, I'm betting this guy looks to bring in another guy to do the > scut work and actual defence, in a year or two when it comes to trial. > > And I *thought* there was a "gag order" in the case .. but that may be a > misremembrance of the facts. One must keep track of so many trials > today that the details often become blurred. > > If there isn't a gag order I'm guessing the next thing will be to go on > telly , Barbara Walters or similar will do an hour interview w/ the > accused, and meanwhile the lawyers get some cash. > Or will they have to wait until the book comes out? ;-)
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
