On 2006/12/27 16:11 (GMT-0500) Brett I. Holcomb apparently typed: > On Wednesday 27 December 2006 15:54, Thomas Hertweck wrote:
>> Brett I. Holcomb wrote: >> > Fedora is really an experimental test distro for RHEL so comparing >> > OpenSuse with it is not really accurate since OpenSuse releases are >> > stable, production ready. >> You're kidding, right? > No. My understanding and the explanation I was given is that OpenSuse > releases - not the betas - are much more stable than Fedora Core is. Updating on Fedora has a different meaning than on other distros. My latest updates to Fedora 5, the release previous to the most recent, and well over 6 months old at the time I updated, got me a 2.6.18-1.2200 kernel to replace the 2.6.15-1.2054 FC5 was released with. Surely such software updating that involves more than just security updates can't be as stable. -- "Let your conversation be always full of grace." Colossians 4:6 NIV Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 Felix Miata *** http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
