On Thursday 28 December 2006 23:29, Fred A. Miller wrote: <snip> > > > Now that they really have backed off supporting KDE (mostly IMHO because > > of the QT license) and opted for GNOME (mainly because of the GTK license > > - aka GPL or LGPL, whatever) and then wonder why no one except a few are > > that enthusiastic about it - could it be as the author said, no real > > maintainers for the GTK project? And now that they have forced SuSE and > > their devs to back off the QT/KDE development they've essentially painted > > themselves (and to an extent us) in a corner. Like the author said - > > pity! (or just braindead - if the shoe fits....). > > Well, SUSE still has quite a few working on the KDE team, and I don't see > that as changing.
I read the article too before you posted it and was waiting for an appropriate time to respond, thinking either "the sky is falling" or things are overblown. My question is - and I wonder if any suse developers read the ot list - this: Is novell no longer supporting KDE financially? If not, then are they taking charge of Gnome? It would seem that a company like Novell would be far better off if they took a stand one way or another. Either they start managing the uglier-than-cow-manure Gnome project directly or they continue to support the far-superior KDE. (Not that I'm biased or anything...) I certianly hope that in-fighting does not mean we'll all be relegated to using an inferior system such as Wintendo someday... > > Fred -- kai - [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.perfectreign.com || www.4thedadz.com www.filesite.org || www.donutmonster.com wo ist der ort für den ehrlichsten kuss ich weiss, dass ich ihn für uns finden muss... -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
