IMHO, the patterns software management feature is far from satisfactory.
I tried it out on a recent 10.2 install, and then when I went back and
tried to customize my installation (adding and deleting rpms), I ran
into strange dependency problems.

For example, I invoked the 'Games' pattern but, wanting to have only a
few things such as pyson  and ksudoku, I removed the various board and
arcade games from the pattern listings.  When I hit 'accept', the
dependencies put the other stuff back in again.  I ended up deleting the
'Games' pattern which, fortunately, allowed the things I didn't want to
be deleted and the ones I wanted to be kept.  In other situations,
deleting a pattern also removed some files I wanted to keep -- and the
worst part was that it did not tell me in advance!  I have little/no
need for the enterprise volume system, but I am not allowed to remove
the rpm unless I also delete the 'Base' pattern, in which case I don't
know what havoc will be created.  The patterns feature ties up things
much too tightly, well beyond the actual dependency relationships, and
removes choice/freedom from Linux.  It is better to use 'groups' if you
want control tailored to your needs.

The absence of the import/export capability that was in 10.0 is also a
major problem.  It can take hours (per machine) to manually adjust an
installation to one's interests and space limitations, or to do a
reinstall of that configuration.  A 'critical' bugzilla has been up
since 10.1, with no evident action.  If the software manager can respond
to a mouse for rpm selection, what is so difficult about reading (or
writing) an ascii file and changing check marks?
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to