On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 02:52 +1100, Basil Chupin wrote: > Hans van der Merwe wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 02:22 +1100, Basil Chupin wrote: > >> Hans van der Merwe wrote: > >>> On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 10:01 -0500, Carl Hartung wrote: > >>>> On Thu January 11 2007 09:48, Basil Chupin wrote: > >>>>> Well mine "disappeared" when I installed the earlier version from OO > >>>>> some many months ago but the original icon from the 10.2 install > >>>>> remained... > >>>> Thanks, Basil. I'd already created a new launcher but was curious if > >>>> your > >>>> experience was the same. > >>>> > >>>> Carl > >>> > >>> On the OO2.1 topic; I see the non anti-aliased font rendering is still > >>> broken (renders Tahoma almost unreadable). > >>> > >>> Is this a OO or OpenSuse problem? > >> Just tried using Tahoma in a test document and found no problems with > >> this font. > >> > >> Do you have Geecko>Configure Desktop>Appearance>Fonts>Use > >> Anti-aliasing>Configure>Use Sub-pixel hinting set to Medium? > >> > >> Cheers. > > > > I have all that setup - my desktop and ALL other apps display fine > > (Tahoma 8pt anti-aliasing off - till up to 12pt) > > Just OO displays horribly with anti-aliasing turned off in its > > configuration. > > Certainly turning off anti-aliasing in OO has some effect (you can see > it immediately in the toolbar) but the Tahoma font is still very much > readable and not as you describe (above). > > Cheers.
Ok unreadable is prop bit harsh - but as you say turning off anti-aliasing in OO and using Tahoma for the menus (like I do for all my other apps) just looks horrible. I see there are others with the same issue: http://en.opensuse.org/Talk:Optimal_Use_of_MS_TrueType_Core_Fonts_for_a_KDE_Desktop_on_SuSE check the last post message. E-Mail disclaimer: http://www.sunspace.co.za/emaildisclaimer.htm -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
