On Thursday 11 January 2007 20:38, John E. Perry wrote: > Randall R Schulz wrote: > > I still don't get why its authors didn't recognize lower-case 'm' > > as equivalent to upper-case 'M'. > > Maybe because M == Mega and m == milli? There's no such collision > with k and K.
Ah. Perhaps that's it. They could still allow 'mK' to equal 1 and 'mM' to equal 1024... > John Perry RRS -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
