On Jan 12 2007 21:45, Janne Karhunen wrote:
>
>> >In a way this is a regression - vpnc almost worked in 10.1 and
>> >SLED10. It used to connect, but connections weren't that stable.
>> >In 10.2 it doesn't even connect. Cisco client next to it works
>> >ok ( given that you first manually port it to recent kernels :/ ).
>>
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\
>>
>> Not that I can see.
>
>I was talking about commercial cisco client, not vpnc. You
>have a version of it that supports 2.4.16+ kernel?
Yes. However, since it taints the kernel because of its proprietary
license and binary blob, I am happy to have vpnc doing exactly the same
using a tunnel device. On top of that, the crappy ciscoshit does not
support NATting clients connected to your local network [VMware machines
and laptops, not the default route] even though the config has an option
for it.
-`J'
--
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
