Rikard Johnels wrote:
On Friday 12 January 2007 23:07, Sandy Drobic wrote:
Rikard Johnels wrote:

But the installer doesn't recognize them at all.
It sees /dev/rd/c0d0 as a full partition, and states it cannot do
anything with it.

How do i get the table read?
How do i initialize the array for usage in the installer?

I am eagerly waiting for the answer as well because I suspect that I
currently have the same problem with an old FSC Primergy 470 with Mylex
DAC960PRL Controller.
Can you delete the partitions and create them in yast again? If not, I
can't update to Suse 10.2 either.

This is how i got around the problem so far;

1. I did a clean install of 10.0 from CD's
This worked perfectly. Both removing the old w2k server partition, and creating new ones for Linux

This is what I ended up doing as well. In my case I had an existing Suse 9.2 installation which I was iching to upgrade because it is no longer supplied with security updates. But the update went without a hitch. So now I can finally enjoy a supported version again.

Neither 10.1 nor 10.2 are able to read the partition table of the installed System on the Mylex DAC960 raid. As this is still a frequently used controller in older machines I am a bit aggravated that a fresh install is not possible.

2. Added a online repository for 10.2 in Yast, and ran a full upgrade

3. I also tried adding a DVD "mounted" and shared from a XP desktop,
        This also works.

I just finished recompiling the all the packages for my mailserver, so I'll just call it a day and maybe wait for version 10.3 to appear.

So from what i can understand, the partition tool "parted" that is used in 10.2 does NOT work on the RAID partition created from the Mylex BIOS.

Yes, that is my experience as well. I had additional trouble even getting the installation to start. Since an Ubuntu CD resulted in similar trouble I am inclined to believe that it's the kernel itself that has changed and not just the Suse version of the installation kernel.

This is very cumbersome, not to mention irritating, as i refurbish several older server systems, and give them a Non-microsoft environment.


Any particular reason as to why SuSE/Novell changed partition manager from 10.0 to 10.2??

No idea, though I think they actually changed to parted in 10.1.

Sandy
--
List replies only please!
Please address PMs to: news-reply2 (@) japantest (.) homelinux (.) com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to