On Sunday 21 January 2007 21:36, John Meyer wrote:
> If you want an alternative view, check this out:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-posting#Top-posting

Yep, as for myself and top or bottom posting - My only real contention is 
coherency.  I do prefer bottom and in line posting, but for short replies I 
could care about top posting.  What drives me nuts personally is with people 
include no or almost no reference to the conversation, and to a lessor degree 
every reply in a thread of say 40 posts (though I'm guilty of this from time 
to time).  The other thing is that a noobie will top post and instead of 
initially trying to inform the noob that most/many on the list prefer 
bottom/in line posts they just start flaming and come across as anal 
retentive elitists.  This goes for the unsubscribe as well - if you point out 
that the "headers" include the unsubscribe info and then, if appropriate, 
inform the unknowing what a header is and how to view it  If then the person 
still doesn't "get it" then I could see people becoming annoyed and ill 
mannered.  But too often people of a non-administrator background get 
lambasted with flames and condescending commits that IMHO are way over the 
top and just rude.   

Others have pointed this behavior out and that they might want to consider as 
Linux moves more to the main stream the list will encounter people of little 
technical background and that non-tolerant behavior is the fastest way to 
drive new users away.  It is supposed to be a help list in the first place.

Just my $0.02.  Curtis.

-- 
Spammers Beware: Trespassers will be shot,
survivors will be shot again!

I don't want a politician I can believe in.
I simply want a politician I can believe!

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to