On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 10:49:27 +0100, Dominique Leuenberger wrote: >> On 07-02-2007 at 11:45, Philipp Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Yes, this is bothersome and should IMHO be changed, even if that >>means that developers would have to keep parallel bugs
>That can not be a real suggestion now.. I don't believe you're serious >in this. Oh yes, I am. But I guess this would be a very small number of bugs. >I had very good experience with BugZilla.. whenever I hit a bug that's >closed because it was initially opened for a EnterPrise product, I drop >the dev a message... most of the time the referred one get's opened very >quick afterwards... Yes, I know that this works. But a reminder for developers to please *not* do it in the first place wouldn't be a bad thing. >Maybe a solution would be to have BugZilla itself check if the linked >BugZilla entry is available and give a report to Admins as soon as a >linked one would point to a closed ( non public) bug report. I don't think so. Remember that bugs in *all* Novell products are tracked in bugzilla. Philipp -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
