> But why couldn't those features have been added to the earlier QT Yast > the same as you're doing with this new Mono thing? Even with the > missing features, I know I, as well as many here, had good luck with it > and certainly fewer problems than the present setup. I never felt the > need to use anything else while it was there.
Thats what we did. YAST2 Packagemanager and YAST Online Update do not use ZMD at all. > I mean I understand Novell had to give Mono a reason for living, > although I don't know why, but why couldn't it have been used as an > alternative or for something else completely? I'm sure many of us feel > like it was forced upon us and that is not such a good thing. We do have another choice. As for forcing, yes, it was also forced on us. Ciao, Marcus -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
