Carlos, On Thursday 01 March 2007 11:52, Carlos E. R. wrote: > The Thursday 2007-03-01 at 11:38 -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote: > > > And yes, I understand all the arguments against reply-to munging. > > > But I don't think you can have it both ways. If you don't want > > > people making personal replies than having reply-to pointing to > > > the original poster's personal address makes little sense. > > > > _That_ I agree with. > > Do you want inifinte mail loops?
Of course not, and I've always supported the decision of this list's managers to refrain from inserting (overwriting) Reply-To headers. So, to clarify, I agree that people who don't want direct replies to their personal accounts should not include Reply-To in their postings. If they include a Reply-To that directs mail to their own account, then they should not complain about receiving such direct replies. > -- > Cheers, > Carlos E. R. Randall Schulz -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
