On Thursday 01 March 2007, Kai Ponte wrote: > I remember thinking that the Gnome group were a bunch > of whining children about the whole idea and that creating a second desktop > would do more overall harm than good.
Rather than concentrate on writing a replacement for the one part of KDE that wasn't totally free (QT) they set out to rebuild the world but without a blueprint or even a coherent plan. The internals of Gnome are a mess. > I still stand by my opinion from then. I don't at all mind Enlightenment, > IceWM and the other "lightweight" desktops, Agreed. KDE is often called bloated, but a GNOME is actually worse after a couple applications are loaded. -- _____________________________________ John Andersen
pgpVz95Na3f0M.pgp
Description: PGP signature
