Joe Morris (NTM) wrote: > James Knott wrote: > >> Funny thing. Just today, someone mentioned the list has reply set to >> sender, instead of list, to avoid endless loops, even though I've never >> seen such a thing on lists that don't set return to sender. >> > I wonder, is there a difference in the users of those lists (i.e. more > technically proficient), or in the volume on those lists? I can hardly > imagine anyone subscribing to 5 or 10 lists with the volume of this > list, don't see how they would have time left for anything else. But, > the other lists I have signed up to over the years were more specialized > and more highly technical, and probably moderated, and thus may reveal > the reason there were no loops. I have seen mail loops, fortunately > between one user's auto responder responding to an auto responder, which > had an end when his mailbox reached his maximum limit. I see the > potential here. >
While I don't have a comparison of message quantities, I also subscribe to the OpenOffice list. While there are certainly some technically proficient members there, the majority are not. That list is fairly busy. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
