On Saturday 03 March 2007 17:05, peter nikolic wrote: > On Saturday 03 March 2007, Carlos E. R. wrote: > > The Saturday 2007-03-03 at 11:39 -0000, peter nikolic wrote: > > > DD/MM/YYYY > > > > > > the best all round soloution .. > > > > No, the best is following the ISO standard. That's what they are for, > > standards. > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > Carlos E. R. > > Not Realy . > > > The ISO standard of YYYY/MM/DD is not the most efficent way of using a date
Translated into English: "It's not what I'm used to, so it's bad" Having grown up in a country that uses yyyymmdd I much prefer the ISO standard -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
