Magnus Boman wrote: > On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 12:07 +0100, Anders Norrbring wrote: > >> kanenas skrev: >> >>> On Sunday 11 February 2007 17:33, Rajko M. wrote: >>> >Tom made some mistakes that he didn't know about, like including >>> >>>> Factory repository that is pre-alpha, >>>> >>> I only glanced at a few posts on this thread, but, has anyone mentioned >>> that >>> the word "factory" does not carry any notions of extreme alpha status? Has >>> the suggestion beemn made to change the name of the directory, so the same >>> mistake is not repeated? The disclaimers are just that, they are everywhere >>> these days, so most of us tend to skip them, no? >>> >> No, we don't. At least not if we're not sure of what we're doing... >> A popular abbreviation is 'RTFM'. >> > > You also get a big fat warning when you add Factory as an installation > source stating that it is ALPHA software. But I guess that's only > another dialog box that's there for users to ignore :-) > > Cheers, > Magnus > > Actually, when I added it to my install list I DID NOT get any warning message. Had to learn the hard way. Now I'm a tiny bit smarter. Life is a learning experience. Every time I blow up SuSE I learn a little something.
-- (o:]>*HUGGLES*<[:o) Billie Walsh The three best words in the English Language: "I LOVE YOU" Pass them on! -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
