On Sunday 11 March 2007, David Brodbeck wrote: > Unfortunately it seems cifs isn't quite ready for primetime yet and is > lacking some functionality that's in smbfs.
The only thing it lacks IIRC is the ability to mount a windows 9X share on the Linux machine. Mounting WinNT/2K/XP/Vista shares works but the syntax is tricky. With cifs there is a good possibility to get rid of nfs and all the coordination of user-ids that is required for that. cifs might not be QUITE as fast as nfs, but it has a lot of other things going for it. So again, the only thing missing is mounting a win9x share on linux. -- _____________________________________ John Andersen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
