On Monday 12 March 2007, Hans van der Merwe wrote:
> My statement:  Shouldn't Samba be treated like USB devices are treated
> at present?  ie. KDE, Gnome knows almost nothing about a particular USB
> device, it inits the mounting process to some extent, but when mounted
> ALL apps can access it.

But that is the way it IS treated.  Once mounted all applications see it
as nothing more than a subdirectory.

So I don't know what the complaint is.  
Are you complaining that kde tries to do too much by offering to mount
smb shares?  Heck, even xfce can do that.

Or are you complaining that it doesn't work any more since the shift
to cifs?

-- 
_____________________________________
John Andersen

Attachment: pgplzA4olvq0m.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to