On Monday 12 March 2007 19:21, John Andersen wrote: > On Monday 12 March 2007, Theo v. Werkhoven wrote: > > Tue, 06 Mar 2007, by [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > Personally I wish SuSE would just drop SuSEfirewall, and include > > > Shorewall instead. I don't expect it to happen anytime soon though, so > > > I recently went ahead and repackaged the rpm to match the SuSE > > > environment. > > > > > > Since I'm no rpm expert either I'm not going to 'publish' said rpms, as > > > they probably contain packaging errors. Still, if someone wants to > > > check them out, contact me privately. > > > > Very late, but nevertheless: the rpms on the shorewall.net site > > integrate perfectly in SUSE afaik, no need to make them yourself. > > <http://shorewall.de/pub/shorewall/3.4/shorewall-3.4.0/shorewall-3.4.0-1. > >noarch.rpm> > > I conure. The shorewall rpms work fine, and even the init script works > great. > > Suse would be better off spending the time they spend on Suse Firewall on a > yast interface for configuring shorewall. As it stands you actually have > to have "advanced skills" like reading a web page and actually typing with > fingers applied to keyboard !!! into a text file in order to get shorewall > up. Oh The Horror of it all!!!
You can install webmin and you will have a graphical interface for configuring Shorewall. Mike -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
