-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The Tuesday 2007-03-20 at 13:42 +0100, Frank Sundermeyer wrote:
> > I think that it should be indeed documented in the manual. Security
> > by obscurity gives a false sense of security: the novice may thing
> > that his computer is safe just because the root password is
> > unguessable, neglecting to protect the access to the physical
> > computer.
>
> sorry if I start to get a little bit angry, but I _strongly_ suggest
> reading the manual _before_ discussing it's contents or complaining
> about allegedly missing content.
Sorry, but you yourself said it was not going to be documented:
> > well, yes, ;-) that would be one way. But you will _never ever_ see
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > documentation about how to break into the system within the official
> > manuals. Feel free to write a Wiki article.
My opinion is that it should be documented.
(I did read the manual, back when it was in paper...)
- --
Cheers,
Carlos E. R.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76
iD8DBQFF/+XdtTMYHG2NR9URAihmAKCCkDYhT2DYeDZ8mDO9CmBRNlNmfACfRjgV
91bDTnsZjjCBS6Bm+ogKOz0=
=Jg/j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
