> >>> > nscd is OK for workstations; but busy servers are best off having > >>> their > >>> > own replicant. In many ways, nscd sucks. > >>> When I understand you correctly, you put an LDAP slave server with > >>> slurpd on each busy server? > >> No, syncrepl. Only use current versions of OpenLDAP. > Sorry, I forgot to confirm that: You still use slurpd to setup (at > least one) backup servers, to protect against minor outages, don't you?
No, slurpd is deprecated, SyncREPL is a complete replacement for all replication purposes. A SyncREPL consumer can bring itself up to syncronization with the SyncREPL master. -- Adam Tauno Williams Network & Systems Administrator Consultant - http://www.whitemiceconsulting.com Developer - http://www.opengroupware.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
