On Wednesday 28 March 2007 01:26:47 pm Joe Shaw wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On 3/28/07, Michael Letourneau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I know many (most?) dislike beagle and turn it off, but I actually have a
> > need to use it right now, and thought it would be a good solution to
> > finding some information I have mis-placed.
>
> I'm the main developer of Beagle, so I'm certainly interested to know
> why people turn it off.  Is it a lack of necessity, is it a failure in
> user experience, is it misbehaving in some way (including CPU pegging
> or memory hogging)?  This is all useful information to me, and I want
> to fix any bugs people come across.

My experiences echo that of others on this list who have already posted. 

On new systems, with beagle turned on, response time becomes erratic or simply 
slow.  These are very noticeable and become quickly annoying to me. Not 
really needing Bob - or beagle - or whatever the name is, I simply euthanize 
it. (Sorry, it is difficult not to poke fun at beagle.)

As a rule, I turn beagle off immediately after install. (I have not done a 
10.2 install yet, because without beagle and zmd running, 10.1 is perfectly 
stable for me and family.)

I noticed that a few others mentioned the possibility of zmd being part of the 
cause. That may be - I tend to remove zmd as soon as possible as well after 
install, because I find it slow and tedious as well.

So, basically, a system not running beagle or bob runs faster and is more 
responsive overall than one running beagle. I've found this on four separate 
systems, all fairly modern systems with at least 1G RAM and either Athlon or 
Pentium 4 processors.

Thanks for listening!

-- 
kai
www.perfectreign.com || www.4thedadz.com
www.filesite.org || www.donutmonster.com

closing the doors that surround me
so no one will ever penetrate
complete my retreat just to wait for the day
that never comes so i will laugh alone
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to