Hi Randall,

Sorry for the delay.  It's been a very busy week in the Cambridge
office, and I've been pretty overwhelmed by the feedback on the thread
so far. (49 messages!)

On 3/29/07, Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 29 March 2007 11:20, Joe Shaw wrote:
> ... I could rattle
> off a long list of bug fixes and go into technical detail about them
> ...

I'm still interested in knowing if you use the file modification daemon
to minimize the amount of file scanning Beagle performs. And if not,
why not? Could it be incorporated?

Beagle uses inotify for this -- in fact, inotify was basically written
*for* Beagle with its use cases in mind.  inotify is a kernel service,
so you actually don't need a separate daemon to use it.

For noticing file changes and such, Beagle depends heavily on inotify.
We still have to crawl files when the Beagle daemon starts up though,
to set up inotify watches on all the directories it pays attention to
and to notice and index any changes that may have happened while
Beagle wasn't running.

Joe
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to